Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
1.
BMJ Open ; 13(5): e071381, 2023 05 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2321709

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Historic disruption in health infrastructure combined with data from a recent vaccine coverage survey suggests there are likely significant immunity gaps to vaccine preventable diseases and high risk of outbreaks in Timor-Leste. Community-based serological surveillance is an important tool to augment understanding of population-level immunity achieved through vaccine coverage and/or derived from prior infection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This national population-representative serosurvey will take a three-stage cluster sample and aims to include 5600 individuals above 1 year of age. Serum samples will be collected by phlebotomy and analysed for measles IgG, rubella IgG, SARS-CoV-2 antispike protein IgG, hepatitis B surface antibody and hepatitis B core antigen using commercially available chemiluminescent immunoassays or ELISA. In addition to crude prevalence estimates and to account for differences in Timor-Leste's age structure, stratified age-standardised prevalence estimates will be calculated, using Asia in 2013 as the standard population. Additionally, this survey will derive a national asset of serum and dried blood spot samples which can be used for further investigation of infectious disease seroepidemiology and/or validation of existing and novel serological assays for infectious diseases. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Research Ethics and Technical Committee of the Instituto Nacional da Saúde, Timor-Leste and the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Northern Territory Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research, Australia. Co-designing this study with Timor-Leste's Ministry-of-Health and other relevant partner organisations will allow immediate translation of findings into public health policy, which may include changes to routine immunisation service delivery and/or plans for supplementary immunisation activities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccine-Preventable Diseases , Humans , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Timor-Leste/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Immunoglobulin G , Northern Territory
2.
Commun Dis Intell (2018) ; 462022 Jan 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2313965

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: More than seventy per cent of salmonellosis in Australia is thought to be due to contaminated food. Rates of salmonellosis vary across the Australian states and territories, with the highest rates in the Northern Territory. In 2020, to control coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), Australia implemented public health measures including border closures, physical distancing and hygiene advice. This study analyses salmonellosis notification rates in 2020 and considers possible impacts of COVID-19 measures. METHODS: Monthly and annual salmonellosis notifications per 100,000 population, for each of Australia's eight states and territories for the years 2015 to 2020, were extracted from Australia's publicly accessible National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. For each jurisdiction, the salmonellosis rate each month in 2020 was compared with the previous 5-year median rate for that calendar month. The possible impacts of COVID-19 public health measures on salmonellosis notifications in the respective states and territories were examined. RESULTS: The annual Australian salmonellosis notification rate was 27% lower in 2020 than the previous 5-year median. The reduction in salmonellosis rate varied throughout Australia. States and territories with more stringent, more frequent or longer COVID-19 public health measures had generally greater salmonellosis rate reductions. However, Tasmania had a 50% deeper reduction in salmonellosis rate than did the Northern Territory, despite similar restriction levels. CONCLUSIONS: Salmonellosis notifications decreased in Australia during the global COVID-19 pandemic. The reduction in notifications corresponded with the implementation of public health measures. Persistence of high rates in the Northern Territory could indicate the overarching importance of demographic and environmental factors.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Diseases , Salmonella Infections , Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Disease Notification , Humans , Northern Territory/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Salmonella Infections/epidemiology
3.
Commun Dis Intell (2018) ; 462022 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2206058

ABSTRACT

Abstract: This report from the Australian Rotavirus Surveillance Program describes the circulating rotavirus genotypes identified in children and adults during the period 1 January to 31 December 2021. During this period, 521 faecal specimens had been referred for rotavirus G- and P- genotype analysis, of which 474 were confirmed as rotavirus positive. Of these, 336/474 were wildtype rotavirus strains and 138/474 were identified as vaccine-like. Of the 336 wildtype samples, 87.5% (n = 294/336) were identified as G8P[8], and were detected in five of the six jurisdictions that provided samples for the reporting period. Two rotavirus outbreaks, located in the Northern Territory and Western Australia, were also attributed to G8P[8]. As with the 2020 reporting period, a low number of stool samples were received for this reporting period as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, an unexpectedly high proportion of samples with unusual genotypes were identified which were potentially zoonotic in nature, including feline G3, P[9], bovine-like G8, P[14], and porcine-like G4, G6, P[1], and P[6]. Ongoing rotavirus surveillance is crucial to identify changes in genotypic patterns and to provide diagnostic laboratories with quality assurance by reporting incidences of wildtype, vaccine-like, or false positive rotavirus results.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Gastroenteritis , Rotavirus Infections , Rotavirus , Animals , Cattle , Cats , Humans , Swine , Rotavirus/genetics , Rotavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics , Gastroenteritis/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Northern Territory/epidemiology
4.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(24)2022 12 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2155102

ABSTRACT

Equivocal evidence suggests that mandatory supervised quarantine can negatively affect psychological well-being in some settings. It was unclear if COVID-19 supervised quarantine was associated with psychological distress in Australia. The sociodemographic characteristics associated with distress and the lived experiences of quarantine are also poorly understood. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the mental well-being of international arrivals undergoing supervised COVID quarantine in a purpose designed facility in the Northern Territory, Australia. We conducted a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods study comprising of an observational cross-sectional survey (n = 117) and individual qualitative interviews (n = 26). The results revealed that several factors were associated with distress, including significantly higher levels of depression for those who smoked, drank alcohol, had pre-existing mental health conditions and had no social networks in quarantine. Levels of psychological distress were also related to waiting time for re-entry (the time between applying to repatriate and returning to Australia) and flight origin. Qualitative data showed that despite quarantine being viewed as necessary, unclear communication and a perception of lack of control were affecting emotional well-being. This information is useful to inform the further development of models to identify those at most risk and support psychological well-being in quarantine settings.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Quarantine/psychology , SARS-CoV-2 , Psychological Well-Being , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Anxiety/psychology , Northern Territory
5.
Commun Dis Intell (2018) ; 462022 Nov 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2116618

ABSTRACT

Abstract: From 1 January to 31 December 2021, forty-eight institutions around Australia participated in the Australian Enterococcal Surveillance Outcome Programme (AESOP). The aim of AESOP 2021 was to determine the proportion of enterococcal bacteraemia isolates in Australia that were antimicrobial resistant, and to characterise the molecular epidemiology of the Enterococcus faecium isolates. Of the 1,297 unique episodes of enterococcal bacteraemia investigated, 94.4% were caused by either E. faecalis (54.1%) or E. faecium (40.3%). Ampicillin resistance was detected in one E. faecalis isolate and in 89.3% of E. faecium isolates. Vancomycin non-susceptibility was not detected in E. faecalis but was detected in 37.9% of E. faecium. Overall, 39.6% of E. faecium harboured the vanA and/or vanB genes. For the vanA/vanB positive E. faecium isolates, 35.8% harboured the vanA gene and 64.2% the vanB gene. Although the percentage of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium bacteraemia isolates was significantly lower than that reported in the 2020 AESOP report (presumably due to the COVID-19 elective surgery restrictions placed on hospitals), it remains substantially higher than that recorded in most European countries. Isolates of E. faecium consisted of 73 multi-locus sequence types (STs); 77.2% of isolates were classified into seven major STs each containing more than ten isolates. All major STs belonged to clonal cluster (CC) 17, a major hospital-adapted polyclonal E. faecium cluster. The major STs (ST17, ST1424, ST796, ST78, ST80, ST1421 and ST555) were found across most regions of Australia. The predominant ST was ST17 which was identified in all regions except the Northern Territory. Overall, 46.5% of isolates belonging to the seven major STs harboured the vanA or vanB gene. The AESOP 2021 has shown that enterococcal bacteraemia episodes in Australia are frequently caused by polyclonal ampicillin-resistant high-level gentamicin resistant vanA- or vanB-positive E. faecium which have limited treatment options.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , COVID-19 , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Agar , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Vancomycin , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Enterococcus/genetics , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Northern Territory
6.
Rural Remote Health ; 22(4): 7541, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2100709

ABSTRACT

In January 2022, as the COVID pandemic reached remote communities in Central Australia, The Northern Territory Health Central Australian Regional Health Service and the Royal Flying Doctor Service (RFDS) executed 'COVID on Country', a program designed to triage cases and to implement treatment and clinical review of individuals in their community without the need to be relocated to larger centres for safe provision of care. The program assessed patient factors and community/capacity factors to triage and enact pathways. Remote living people who qualified for the program or who declined aeromedical retrieval, were provided with comprehensive clinical support, including administration of intravenous sotrovimab by daily scheduled visits to all affected communities by a doctor transported on an RFDS plane. Evaluation of the program demonstrated that it was a safe and effective way to provide complex care in a culturally safe manner.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Physicians , Rural Health Services , Humans , Pandemics , Northern Territory
7.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 11(1): 120, 2022 09 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2053969

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Safe donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE) are critical to prevent transmission of infectious diseases. Novel strategies to improve infection prevention and control (IPC) adherence can optimise safety. We describe and quantify video surveillance of doffing at an outdoor hotel quarantine facility led by the Australian Medical Assistance Team in the Northern Territory, Australia. METHODS: Motion-activated video cameras were installed in seven areas where personnel doffed PPE upon exit from an area dedicated to quarantined residents. Video footage was reviewed daily and compliance issues were identified using a standardised checklist and risk graded to initiate feedback. We collated audit data from 1 February to 18 April 2021 to describe trends by month, staff group, doffing component and risk. RESULTS: In 235 h of video footage, 364 compliance issues were identified, of which none were considered high-risk compromising to PPE integrity. Compliance issues were low risk (55/364, 15%) or moderate risk (309/364, 85%) and the most common issue was missed or inadequate hand hygiene (156/364, 43%). Compliance issues per minute of video footage reviewed decreased following introduction of the activity, from 24 per 1000 in February to 7 per 1000 in March and April. CONCLUSION: Video surveillance with feedback supported rapid response to improve IPC adherence in a challenging ambient environment. The activity focused on perfection to identify compliance issues that would go unreported in most healthcare settings and contributed to a suit of activities that prevented any high-risk PPE breaches or compromises to safety.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Quarantine , Electronics , Humans , Northern Territory , Personal Protective Equipment
8.
Aust N Z J Public Health ; 46(5): 633-639, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1922804

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the operationalisation of a novel outdoor quarantine facility managed by the Australian Medical Assistance Team, the Howard Springs International Quarantine Facility (HSIQF) at the Centre for National Resilience in the Northern Territory, Australia. METHODS: We collated documentation and data from HSIQF to describe policies and procedures implemented and performed a descriptive analysis of key procedures and outcomes. RESULTS: From 23 October 2020 to 31 March 2021, 2.2% (129/5,987) of residents were confirmed COVD-19 cases. On average per day, 82 [Interquartile Range (IQR): 29-95] staff completed personal protective equipment (PPE) training, 94 [IQR: 90-104] staff completed antigen testing and 51 [IQR: 32-136] staff completed polymerase chain reaction testing. The operation focused on building a safe environment with infection prevention and control adherence and workforce sustainability. There was no leakage of SARS-CoV-2 to staff or the community and no PPE compromises requiring staff to quarantine for 14 days. CONCLUSION: HSIQF demonstrates the operationalisation of an effective, safe and replicable quarantine system. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Quarantine is a critical public health tool for pandemic control. The HSIQF operations may be useful to inform the establishment and management of quarantine facilities for future and current disease outbreaks.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Quarantine , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Northern Territory , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2
10.
BMC Public Health ; 22(1): 953, 2022 05 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1846816

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In response to the threat of COVID-19 infection, Australia mandated a 14 day quarantine period in a designated facility for all travellers returning from overseas from late March 2020. These facilities were usually hotels, or hotel-like serviced apartments, and also included a repurposed former mining village in the Northern Territory. This paper aimed to investigate the experiences of risk of people quarantined in designated supervised facilities in Australia, which has not been systematically explored before. METHODS: In this qualitative study semi-structured interviews were conducted with 58 participants quarantined between March 2020 and January 2021. Participants were returned Australian citizens and residents who were required to undergo mandatory supervised quarantine for COVID-19. Interviews were conducted using video teleconferencing (via Zoom), transcribed and coded, then analysed thematically. RESULTS: While participants generally supported the concept of quarantine to protect the Australian public, they were critical of elements of it where they felt exposed to risk (COVID-related or not). They also described instances where infection control within the system seemed inadequate. For some, particularly those quarantined with small children, they reported that the facilities were inadequate or inappropriate for health and wellbeing. Using thematic analysis, three major themes were identified that related to problems in the existing system: perception of being subjected to high risk through lax standards of COVID protection in the quarantine process; risks to the community identified in quarantine; and risk in non-hotel managed quarantine facilities. CONCLUSIONS: There are systemic issues with infection control in hotel quarantine, which can be further undermined by individual non-compliance. Risks to safety for those in quarantine can be reduced, both in terms of infection control within hotel quarantine and, in the case of the Northern Territory facility, timely in-person medical care as needed for non-COVID conditions. Systems of infection control need ongoing review to ensure that people entering quarantine are protected from known risks of infection at every stage. Medical services in quarantine facilities should be examined to ensure timely and appropriate non-COVID medical services are available.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Quarantine , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Child , Humans , Infection Control , Northern Territory/epidemiology , Qualitative Research
11.
BMJ Open ; 12(3): e050153, 2022 03 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1816761

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: It is plausible that a longer duration of nutrition intervention may have a greater impact on clinical and patient-centred outcomes. The Intensive Nutrition care Therapy comparEd to usual care iN criTically ill adults (INTENT) trial will determine if a whole hospital nutrition intervention is feasible and will deliver more total energy compared with usual care in critically ill patients with at least one organ system failure. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a prospective, multicentre, unblinded, parallel-group, phase II randomised controlled trial (RCT) conducted in 23 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Mechanically ventilated critically ill adult patients with at least one organ failure who have been in intensive care unit (ICU) for 72-120 hours and meet all of the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria will be randomised to receive either intensive or usual nutrition care. INTENT started recruitment in October 2018 and a sample size of 240 participants is anticipated to be recruited in 2022. The study period is from randomisation to hospital discharge or study day 28, whichever occurs first, and the primary outcome is daily energy delivery from nutrition therapy. Secondary outcomes include daily energy and protein delivery during ICU and in the post-ICU period, duration of ventilation, ventilator-free days, total bloodstream infection rate and length of hospital stay. All other outcomes are considered tertiary and results will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been received in Australia (Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee (HREC/18/Alfred/101) and Human Research Ethics Committee of the Northern Territory Department of Health (2019-3372)) and New Zealand (Northern A Health and Disability Ethics Committee (18/NTA/222). Results will be disseminated in an international peer-reviewed journal(s), at scientific meetings and via social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03292237.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Nutrition Therapy , Adult , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Critical Illness/therapy , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Northern Territory , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
12.
Commun Dis Intell (2018) ; 462022 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1812119

ABSTRACT

From 1 January to 31 December 2020, forty-nine institutions around Australia participated in the Australian Enterococcal Sepsis Outcome Programme (AESOP). The aims of AESOP 2020 were to determine the proportion of enterococcal bacteraemia isolates in Australia that were antimicrobial-resistant, and to characterise the molecular epidemiology of the E. faecium isolates. Of the 1,230 unique episodes of enterococcal bacteraemia investigated, 93.9% were caused by either E. faecalis (54.2%) or E. faecium (39.7%). Ampicillin resistance was not detected in E. faecalis but was detected in 88.2% of E. faecium . Vancomycin non-susceptibility was detected in 0.2% of E. faecalis and 32.6% of E. faecium . Overall, 35.2% of E. faecium harboured vanA and/or vanB genes. For the vanA/B positive E. faecium isolates, 38.8% harboured the vanA gene, 60.6% the vanB gene, and 0.6% harboured both vanA and vanB . Although the percentage of E. faecium bacteraemia isolates was significantly lower than that detected in the 2019 AESOP (presumably due to the COVID-19 elective surgery restrictions placed on hospitals), it remains substantially higher than that recorded in most European countries. The E. faecium isolates detected consisted of 71 multilocus sequence types (STs), with 81.7% of these isolates classified into eight major STs each containing ten or more isolates. All major STs belonged to clonal cluster 17 (CC17), a major hospital-adapted polyclonal E. faecium cluster. The major STs (ST17, ST1424, ST80, ST796, ST78, ST1421, ST555 and ST117) were found across most regions of Australia. The predominant clone was ST17, which was identified in all regions except the Northern Territory. Overall, 40.9% of isolates belonging to the eight major STs harboured the vanA or vanB gene. The AESOP 2020 has shown enterococcal bacteraemia episodes in Australia are frequently caused by polyclonal ampicillin-resistant high-level gentamicin-resistant vanA - or vanB -positive E. faecium which have limited treatment options.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , COVID-19 , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections , Sepsis , Agar , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Enterococcus/genetics , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Northern Territory , Sepsis/drug therapy , Sepsis/epidemiology
14.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 18(10)2021 05 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1247985

ABSTRACT

High prevalence of chronic and infectious diseases in Indigenous populations is a major public health concern both in global and Australian contexts. Limited research has examined the role of built environments in relation to Indigenous health in remote Australia. This study engaged stakeholders to understand their perceptions of the influence of built environmental factors on chronic and infectious diseases in remote Northern Territory (NT) communities. A preliminary set of 1120 built environmental indicators were systematically identified and classified using an Indigenous Indicator Classification System. The public and environmental health workforce was engaged to consolidate the classified indicators (n = 84), and then sort and rate the consolidated indicators based on their experience with living and working in remote NT communities. Sorting of the indicators resulted in a concept map with nine built environmental domains. Essential services and Facilities for health/safety were the highest ranked domains for both chronic and infectious diseases. Within these domains, adequate housing infrastructure, water supply, drainage system, reliable sewerage and power infrastructure, and access to health services were identified as the most important contributors to the development of these diseases. The findings highlight the features of community environments amenable to public health and social policy actions that could be targeted to help reduce prevalence of chronic and infectious diseases.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases , Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Health Workforce , Humans , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Northern Territory/epidemiology , Population Groups , Public Health
15.
Commun Dis Intell (2018) ; 442020 Oct 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-962054

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Strict physical distancing measures and border controls have been introduced in the Northern Territory (NT), and across Australia, to reduce the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). These measures have been associated with reduced incidence of other respiratory illnesses such as influenza. It is currently unclear what effect these measures have on non-respiratory communicable diseases. The incidence of notifiable non-respiratory communicable diseases within the NT, from 15 March to 15 May 2020, the period of most restrictive physical distancing, was monitored and is here compared with two control periods: (i) the 4 months immediately prior and (ii) the same two-month period from the preceding 5 years. During the study period, there was a decline in incidence of communicable enteric illnesses, particularly in shigellosis and rotavirus where person-to-person spread is the main transmission route. There was an increase in chlamydial conjunctivitis in areas with endemic trachoma, which is under further investigation. There was no observed increase in conditions associated with crowding, such as those related to group A streptococcal infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Physical Distancing , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , Communicable Diseases/microbiology , Humans , Incidence , Northern Territory/epidemiology , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
17.
Commun Dis Intell (2018) ; 442020 Jul 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-638423

ABSTRACT

The Northern Territory (NT) Centre for Disease Control (CDC) undertook contact tracing of all notified cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) within the Territory. There were 28 cases of COVID-19 notified in the NT between 1 March and 30 April 2020. In total 527 people were identified as close contacts over the same period; 493 were successfully contacted; 445 were located in the NT and were subsequently quarantined and monitored for disease symptoms daily for 14 days after contact with a confirmed COVID-19 case. Of these 445 close contacts, 4 tested positive for COVID-19 after developing symptoms; 2/46 contacts who were cruise ship passengers (4.3%, 95% CI 0.5-14.8%) and 2/51 household contacts (3.9%, 95% CI 0.5-13.5%). None of the 326 aircraft passengers or 4 healthcare workers who were being monitored in the NT as close contacts became cases.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , COVID-19 , Child , Contact Tracing , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Northern Territory/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Virus Shedding , Young Adult
18.
Commun Dis Intell (2018) ; 442020 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-630611

ABSTRACT

The Northern Territory (NT) Centre for Disease Control (CDC) undertook contact tracing of all notified cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) within the Territory. There were 28 cases of COVID-19 notified in the NT between 1 March and 30 April 2020. In total 527 people were identified as close contacts over the same period; 493 were successfully contacted; 445 were located in the NT and were subsequently quarantined and monitored for disease symptoms daily for 14 days after contact with a confirmed COVID-19 case. Of these 445 close contacts, 4 tested positive for COVID-19 after developing symptoms; 2/46 contacts who were cruise ship passengers (4.3%, 95% CI 0.5-14.8%) and 2/51 household contacts (3.9%, 95% CI 0.5-13.5%). None of the 326 aircraft passengers or 4 healthcare workers who were being monitored in the NT as close contacts became cases.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Contact Tracing , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Family Characteristics , Humans , Northern Territory/epidemiology , Pandemics , Public Health , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Time Factors , Travel
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL